I agree with the guys above, a lot of the time I don't feel well (too much typing gives me a headache I have 4 messed up disc in my neck) and thats the last thing on my mind is posting why I like a play. Not to mention, I don't type worth a shit and it takes entirely too much time for me. I probably type 5 to 7 words per minute. I have to look at the board to type and I have hugh fingers and make a lot of errors while typing. It probably took me better than 5 minutes to reply to this.
I can make it easy, from now on all of my plays will be what I call the SHARP plays. For instance tonight My late play was New Mexico +10, the line opened up San Diego State -11 and SD ST had 58% of the wagers on them compared to 42% on New Mexico and the line Dropped to -10, that tells me the Sharps be larger amounts of money on New Mexico.
The same thing happened in the Ill-Chi/Wright St game. The line opened up Wright St -7 and dropped to -5, while Wright St had 66% of the wagers on them.
I did make a mistake betting DePaul, only 53% of the wagers were on 1 side of the game and I should not have played Depaul. I am still trying to learn this system. It is the one that Charles wrote about in the forum.
I am thinking that 66% of the wager must be on one side to make this system a play, while 53%/47% was just not enough to justify a play on DePaul.
I hope this answers your question as far as I am concerned.
The 5 minutes I said earlier that it took me to type this responce just went up to 25 minutes and a hurting neck!!!!
__________________
Nick
|