[DUlrich1227]

whew finally have some time to cap and gamble again ..

ill be back later to post my plays ..

NOW VAMOS AA against that punk !!

[naught33]

hey man, i feel the same way you do...been busy as hell of late...but wow, AA getting no respect from the books...how can he be such a big dog aganst nadal on grass no less...kendrick by all rights should have taken out nadal, AA wont let him off the hook tomorrow, AA wins in 4 sets, wouldnt surprise me for him to win in 3

[Tommy]

Agassi should win as far as I'm concerned against Nadal. Nadal has been struggling. How Kendrick lost that match yesterday was beyond me.

I know it won't happen, but I'd really like to see Federer meets Nadal on grass. Nadal with no serve and no nasty high backspin = Steam Roll.

[Tommy]

Originally Posted by DUlrich1227

whew finally have some time to cap and gamble again ..

ill be back later to post my plays ..

NOW VAMOS AA against that punk !!

Great to see you back David

[DUlrich1227]

ok girls .. here are the plays ..

A.AGASSI GAMES WON +3½ +113
100 to win 113
ANDRE AGASSI (ENG) +180
100 to win 180
DMITRY TURSUNOV (ENG) +126
100 to win 126
LLEYTON HEWITT (ENG) -255
255 to win 100
SEBASTIEN GROSJEAN (ENG) -230
230 to win 100

GL IF YOU PLAY EM ! * i may hit turs again

[naught33]

u know what brotha i like all those plays....only one im iffy on would be grosjean, bc u never know what u get w bag daddy...but they all look solid, i cant beliewve this price on AA, what r the books thinking...

[TheOneTheOnly2006]

Andre Agassi being an underdog is a laugher...and an absolute GEM for us! I like the parlays brother...

I ALSO HAVE TURSINOV over LJUBICIC...and I'm taking FERNANDO GONZO GONZALEZ over DAVID FERRER...he looked good against Safin in his last match.

GL TO ALL.

[hnyloc]

kendrick stayed in that match because of his booming serving and he was playing out of his mind.. to beat nadal, you need big serve, andre dont have one. hate to fade the master but nadal in 4

my other plays..

Rochus 3-1 +710
Rochus 3-2 +800

Tursonov 3-1 +459
Tursonov 3-2 +630

Murray 3-1 +710
Murray 3-2 +800

Nadal 3-1 +270
Nadal 3-2 +600

All 1unit plays

[DUlrich1227]

ok so whats the deal..

NO AA V NADAL ON TV ?? THEY ARE NOT EVEN TALKING ABOUT ON ESPN2

[naught33]

ya i thought that was bs, they are instead showing it taped delayed at noon i believe....dont wanna see it now knowing AA didnt have his A game and got worked like a cheapa whore today..i never questioned he could lose, but certainly didnt see him losing like that, wow..wonder if it was nadal played amazing or AA wasnt very good

[hnyloc]

Yo Naught.. i watched the match and seems like Agassi gave his all in that first set.. was up on Nadal in the tie-breaker but Nadal played some great tennis to win it.. then after that, Agassi showed his age and Nadal just stepped on the gas pedal hitting some amazing shots.. Nadal just out-muscled Andre winning all the long rallys

[naught33]

nice calls on hewitt and tursy....hope grosjean hits for ya bro

[DUlrich1227]

FERNANDO VERDASCO (ENG) +130
100 to win 130
F.VERDASCO GAMES WON +2½ -110
110 to win 100
*looking for a close match here with nando edging out steppy
DMITRY TURSUNOV (ENG) -174
348 to win 200



yea AA got outmuscled out there ...oh wells was defintly woth a shot in my opinion.. hopefully he has a good showing at the open...

fuggin seb... should have listend to naughty boy on mr irratic.. rifht to the top of the black list he went

[naught33]

hey man...yeah oi watched that AA/nadal match last night...despite how AA couldnt get on nadals serve he was battling his ass off in that 1st set...i really though 5-2 up in the tb he had that set, then it would have been interesting to see if nadal could have kept that level of play up the whole match...once andre lost that tb and set u could tell he knew he was in major trouble...i give him props for battling to the end, just couldnt get his teeth into that match

havent looked in depth at the lines yet, but agree w you dave on tursunov, i think he wins tomorow...im not sure about verdasco...dont know what to take away from his match against bandy..did verdasco just whoop him or was nalbandian disinterested...there were a lot of rumors surfacing that nalbandian was more concerned w watching the argentina/germany game then w his match w verdasco...just food for thought. ill take a peek and do some research later in the day and post in here if i see anything atp or wta worthwhile...have a safe holiday bro!

[DUlrich1227]

1 more for today ..

ANASTASIA MYSKINA (ENG) -230
460 to win 200

venus handed the match to jj on sat wiht 54 ue's jj also palyed the net well but i think nastya will be able to handle that game a little better and have a repeat of last year with a win here.

[naught33]

i like djokovic +4.5 over ancic....wawrinka was hanging right in there w ancic thru 2 sets until the match got posponed then he just left his game in the locker room the next day...i could see a 6-4 7-6 3-6 7-6 kind of match...def see djo winning a set and think he has a chance to pull the upset today.

[Tommy]

Man, I hope nobody thinks Nadal is anything special on grass now with that cake walk of a draw. He's played a bunch of challenger players with the exception of AA, who mind as well be a challenger player as well right now.

Bogdanovic, Kendrick, washed up AA and Labadze.

Nadal plays Jarkko now. If Jarkko is on his game I think he wins here.

If Nadal beats Jarkko easily and then beats Hewitt, then I'll be impressed and think he's becoming a force on grass. Until then, he's beaten no one worth mentioning.

[naught33]

the biggest reason why nadal is winning is the serve...his serve is dictating play...kendrick gave nadal trouble only bc of the serve and volley and the big serve...against AA, i was surprised how AA couldnt getr a read on nadals serve..AA is very far from a challenger level player, that was a ridiculous comment, he obviously isnt in top form or in the best shape and hadnt played but 1 match since the beginning of the yr coming into wimbledon, but still, its a good win. hewitt doesnt impress me, i think nadal will have more trouble w jarko than he would lleyton right now

[Tommy]

Originally Posted by naught33

the biggest reason why nadal is winning is the serve...his serve is dictating play...kendrick gave nadal trouble only bc of the serve and volley and the big serve...against AA, i was surprised how AA couldnt getr a read on nadals serve..AA is very far from a challenger level player, that was a ridiculous comment, he obviously isnt in top form or in the best shape and hadnt played but 1 match since the beginning of the yr coming into wimbledon, but still, its a good win. hewitt doesnt impress me, i think nadal will have more trouble w jarko than he would lleyton right now

Agassi is washed up, I see it, everyone sees it, even he sees it to decide to retire this year.

Hewitt is much better than the 3 challengers I mentioned on his worst day. Why are you even talking about Kendrick like hes good or something?? LOL

Hewitt was the king of grass before Federer started to dominate so if hes on his game and Nadal wins then I'll give him props, can't do it now after beating 3 juniors and a washed up, no play all year Agassi.

[TheOneTheOnly2006]

I believe all u guys are over looking the man who is going to the finals...Marcos Baghdatis! He is a monster. It will be a repeat of the Australian Open...Baghdatis vs. Federer Part 2. Mark my words...muhahaha...